The Index is bounded by its worst dimension, not its best
Coding sits at 81. Embodiment sits at 41 and did not move this quarter. Only one of those numbers tells you when we get there.
PreviewAll content, scores and forecasts here are illustrative sample data — not reporting, and not measurements.What this means
What it means
Original work by the Agitology desk. Every piece carries the Index methodology directly, which means it gets revised when the scores underneath it move — and the revision is published rather than quietly applied.
Showing 5 of 5 items.
Coding sits at 81. Embodiment sits at 41 and did not move this quarter. Only one of those numbers tells you when we get there.
Generation got dramatically cheaper. Checking the output did not. That asymmetry determines where capability gains actually land.
Agent benchmarks are saturating while production success rates lag. The gap is not measurement error — it is the measurement working correctly on the wrong thing.
A single number about AGI progress is either a useful summary or a false precision machine. Which one depends entirely on how you read it.
Autonomous laboratories now close the experimental loop. They have not yet decided what is worth investigating, and that is the whole dimension.